On the last
once-in-a-lifetime date of this century, the US Federal Reserve chairman
Ben Bernanke (BB) announced a decision to buy additional $45 billion a month of
long-term securities along with $40 billion a month of mortgage backed securities
– widely referred to as QE4. Yes, its $85 billion a month of buying securities
that BB was talking about!!
The trigger point: Post the economic
crisis in 2008-09, the Fed, to support a stronger economic recovery, took some bold
steps to loosen monetary policy and increase demand. It decided to keep
interest rates at ultra low levels and begin a program of bond buying to inject
money into the economy to boost nominal spending. This helps because buying
long-term securities pushes up the asset prices and lowers yields, thus lowering
the borrowing costs for the firms.
In order to
stimulate borrowings and create jobs in the economy, BB promised himself and to
the world to keep the rates low and continue spending until the unemployment
rate falls below 6.5%.
But looks like
BB totally ignored the impact of this program on other important economic
factors!!! Won’t keeping interest rates low and infusing $85 billion every
month push up the inflation in the medium to long term? It’s a concern because,
after all, high inflation rate doesn’t support economic growth.
Now, let’s go back to 2011 when the US
Congress agreed to the Budget Control Act 2011 in exchange of raising the debt
limit by $2.1 trillion. The BCA 2011 was introduced to reduce the deficit of
the country by $1.2 trillion by the end of 2012. However, there was this
condition that if the government is not able to meet this target, spending cuts
in defense and other discretionary expenditures will automatically trigger at
the start of 2013. That’s exactly what happened on the 1st of March
this year!! This is referred to as the ‘sequestration
effect’ which triggered automatic spending cuts of $85 billion over the
remaining seven months of this fiscal year and will continue to cut $1.2
trillion every year till 2021. As one would easily interpret, the underlying aim
here is to reduce the fiscal deficit of the country by cutting on expenditures,
drastically.
An analysis,
however, says that this automatic spending cuts is expected to put 2.14 million
American jobs at risk pushing the unemployment rate to above 9% (current rate is
7.6%). It is also expected to push the US economy towards recession.
This leads to
another argument: Won’t the (desired) impact of spending $85 billion per month
be set off against the (undesired) impact of automatic spending cuts due to the
sequestration effect? What about BB’s dream to reduce unemployment rate and
boost economic growth? Pchch… wondering when will that turn into reality?
The current
situation of the US economy reminds me of the 2008-09 recession. The only
reason why we saw the recession of 2008-09 was that money was made available easily,
at cheap rates. The current economic situation resembles very much to the
situation of 2008-09. Money is available at cheap rates, housing prices are
rising again, US stock markets have hit an all time high breaking 16 years
record and there is political instability too.
Wondering over
where’s the US economy going again? Well, we can only wait and watch and hope
for the best!! *fingers crossed*
9 comments:
Crisp, short, to the point.. Bravo buddy..!!! :D
Very nice written ...!!!!
Nicely written bro!!! Good job!!
Gud JOb Buddy.. Thts some good, food for thought..
Seema like US minister is just creating an illusion of all is well!
To the point, informative, & very well written.
Nice interpretation of current scenario in the US.. but what I feel is, the US is going on right path by providing "monetary stimulus" to set off its "sequester effect" (without dampening its economic growth). Second thing, talking about "Inflation", it is unlikely to go up because it is "US" (and not India, where the inflation is a byproduct of Infrastructure block).The US is well developed to absorb this kind of money supply. If you look at the fundamentals of economics it says even the "circulation of money" can boost the economic growth and that's what the US is trying to do. Moreover, a cut on defence spending (a big component of fiscal deficit) is a good move. However, I agree with your views to some extent. But you can't judge any given situation by looking at only one side of the coin..!!!!! :-)
Its an interesting read Mukesh. Especially highlighting the scenario which US went & would go through in the future as well. Keep it up! Looking forward to more such blogs.
Nicely written!!
Your viewpoints are strongly expressed. Interesting Read.
The flow and clarity of your blog is very good.
Looking forward for more such blogs :)
Post a Comment